SIST EN 15269-5:2026

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-oktober-2026
Nadomešča:
SIST EN 15269-5:2014+A1:2017
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti
za vrata, zaporne elemente in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 5.
del: Požarna odpornost zastekljenih vrat v kovinskih okvirjih in oken, ki se
odpirajo
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware -
Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted metal framed glazed doorsets and
openable windows
Erweiterte Anwendung von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder
Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und zu öffnenden Fenstern einschließlich ihrer
Baubeschläge - Teil 5: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von verglasten Drehflügeltüren und zu
öffnenden Fenstern mit Metall(rohr)rahmen
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

Application étendue des résultats d’essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou
d’étanchéité à la fumée des blocs portes, blocs fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 5 : Résistance au feu des blocs
portes vitrés battants et pivotants, à ossature métallique, et des fenêtres vitrées à
ossature métallique
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 15269-5:2026
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
91.190 Stavbna oprema Building accessories
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN 15269-5
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
August 2026
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 13.220.50 Supersedes EN 15269-5:2014+A1:2016
English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance
and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable
window assemblies, including their elements of building
hardware - Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted
metal framed glazed doorsets and openable windows
Application étendue des résultats d'essais en matière Erweiterte Anwendung von Prüfergebnissen zur
de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit
blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y von Türen, Toren und zu öffnenden Fenstern
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 5:
Partie 5: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes vitrés Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von verglasten
battants et pivotants, à ossature métallique, et des Drehflügeltüren und zu öffnenden Fenstern mit
fenêtres vitrées à ossature métallique Metall(rohr)rahmen
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 5 July 2026.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2026 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 15269-5:2026 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
1 Scope . 4
2 Normative references . 4
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Determination of the field of extended application . 8
4.1 General . 8
4.2 How to use extended application rules in Annex A, Table A.1 . 9
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application . 9
4.4 Analysis of fire resistance test results . 10
5 Classification report . 10
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations . 11
Annex B (normative) Arrangements for doorsets incorporating side and/or transom and /or
bottom panels . 186
B.1 Side/transom panel arrangement for doorsets according to Annex A rule E.1.1 . 186
B.2 Side/transom/bottom panel arrangement for windows according to Annex A rule E.1.2
........................................................................................................................................................................... 191
Annex C (normative) Rule on which part of EN 15269 to use for which type of doorset . 208
Bibliography . 213

European foreword
This document (EN 15269-5:2026) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety
in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by February 2027 and conflicting national standards shall
be withdrawn at the latest by February 2027.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes EN 15269-5:2014+A1:2016.
This document has been prepared under a standardization request addressed to CEN by the European
Commission. The Standing Committee of the EFTA States subsequently approves these requests for its
Member States.
This document is part of the EN 15269 series, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or
smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building
hardware.
A list of all parts in the EN 15269 series can be found on the CEN website: www.cencenelec.eu.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and the United
Kingdom.
1 Scope
This document covers hinged and pivoted steel (any kind) and aluminium based framed, glazed doorsets
or openable windows. Throughout this document, the term “doorset” will be used to cover both doorsets
and openable windows, unless otherwise stated. It specifies a method for extending the application of
test results obtained from fire resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 4, the
extended application can cover all or some of the following examples:
— integrity (E), integrity & radiation (EW) or integrity & insulation (EI or EI ), self-closing (C)
1 2
classification,
— door leaf and window leaf,
— glazing within the doorset (e.g. for door leaf, side, transom and overpanels),
— air transfer devices (e.g. ventilation louvers or air transfer grilles),
— side panels, transom panels, flush over panels,
— components (e.g. frame and/or suspension system) fixed to the supporting construction (e.g. wall
and/or ceiling),
— items of building hardware,
— decorative and protective finishes,
— intumescent strips and intumescent or non-intumescent (e.g. smoke, draught or acoustic) seals,
— alternative supporting construction(s).
This document does not cover doorsets installed horizontally (e.g. in a ceiling).
The effect on the classification durability of self-closing for the doorsets following an extended
application process is not addressed in this document. The effect on the Classification smoke control for
the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed in this document.
Annex A (normative) provides a thorough list about some of the possible construction parameter
variations and the applicability of rules for the extended application of test results.
Annex B (normative) shows different arrangements for doorsets incorporating side and/or over panels.
Annex C (normative) provides with its Figures (from Figure C.1 to C.6) further clarification concerning
the suitability of applying EN 15269-5 (or other parts of EN 15269) depending on the type of doorset for
which the extended application of results are intended.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 179, Building hardware - Emergency exit devices operated by a lever handle or push pad, for use on
escape routes - Requirements and test methods
EN 572-9, Glass in building - Basic soda lime silicate glass products - Part 9: Evaluation of
conformity/Product standard
EN 1125, Building hardware - Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal bar, for use on escape routes -
Requirements and test methods
EN 1155, Building hardware - Electrically powered hold-open devices for swing doors - Requirements and
test methods
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests - Part 1: General Requirements
EN 1364-1, Fire resistance tests for non-loadbearing elements - Part 1: Walls
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware - Part 1: Fire resistance test for door and shutter assemblies and openable
windows
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and
elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building
hardware
EN 1748-2-2, Glass in building - Special basic products - Glass ceramics - Part 2-2: Evaluation of
conformity/Product standard
EN 12365-2, Building hardware - Gasket and weatherstripping for doors, windows, shutters and curtain
walling - Part 2: Linear compression force test methods
EN 12519, Windows and pedestrian doors. Terminology
EN 13024-2, Glass in building - Thermally toughened borosilicate safety glass - Part 2: Evaluation of
conformity/Product standard
EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements - Part 2: Classification using
data from fire resistance and/or smoke control tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 15254-4:2018, Extended application of results from fire resistance tests - Non-loadbearing walls -
Part 4: Glazed constructions
EN 15269-1, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 1: General
requirements
EN 15269-2, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance of
hinged and pivoted steel doorsets
EN 15725, Extended application on the fire performance of construction products and building elements:
Principle of EXAP standards and EXAP reports
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety - Vocabulary (ISO 13943)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1363-1, EN 1634-1, EN 1634-2,
EN 12519, EN 15269-1, EN 15725 and EN ISO 13943 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp/
— IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
full scale test
test of a full scale doorset
Note 1 to entry: The method of reference for determining the fire resistance of the products in the scope of this
standard shall be EN 1634-1.
3.2
small scale test
test on items of building hardware
Note 1 to entry: The method of reference for characterizing the influence on fire performance of items of building
hardware for incorporation into the products in the scope of this standard shall be EN 1634-2. EN 1634-2 also
defines the decision process that permits its use.
3.3
effective rebate depth
dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame,
transom or side panel or flush overpanel as well as at door leaf meeting edges (on double leaf doorsets)
Note 1 to entry: At the meeting edges and for rebated leaves, this dimension will be the rebate where the
intumescent seal is fitted or, if no seal is fitted, the depth of the largest rebate (see Figure 1).

Key
x1 example of effective rebate depth in doorset to be tested
x2 example of resulting effective rebate depth during testing after movement of 20 mm
Figure 1 — Effective rebate depth
3.4
opening outwards
opening the door leaf away from the fireside
3.5
opening inwards
opening the door leaf towards the fireside
3.6
faces and sides of a hinged door leaf
all of the surfaces, faces and sides of a door panel that swing open and closed
Note 1 to entry: An example is shown in Figure 2.

Key
1 opening face 4 hinge side
2 closing face 5 top side
3 lock side 6 bottom side
Figure 2 — Example of faces and sides of a hinged door leaf
3.7
representative
doorset design having ‘fundamentally the same’ or ‘similar’ construction as another doorset leaf design
for the purpose of evaluating parameter variations, providing the relevant aspects of tested performance
are considered
Note 1 to entry: See EN 15269-1 for further guidance on evaluation of ‘similar’/’fundamentally the same’.
3.8
intumescent seal
intumescent strips and seals with intumescent characteristics
3.9
dog bolt / movement restrictor
additional part (e.g. a bolt) on the hinge side of the doorset which can bear forces such as those caused
by levering for burglary or by deflection in case of fire
3.10
load bearing item of building hardware
item of building hardware which transmits or may transmit forces and/or torques between door leaf and
door frame either under normal conditions or under fire conditions
EXAMPLES Hinges, latches, locks and dog bolts.
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, two representative specimens of
the doorset, one with the exposure of the opening face and one with the exposure of the closing face, shall
have been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 to achieve a test result which could generate a fire
resistance classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the fire resistance classification
required from extended application considerations. These tests are referred to in this document as basic
tests.
NOTE If a doorset is classified from one side only (e.g. just opening face), the extended application rules cannot
lead to a classification of the opposite side or of both sides.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics
may be improved by a particular construction parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the
basis of retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the
test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific construction
parameter beyond that achieved during any one fire resistance test unless specifically identified in
Table A.1.
4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any component of the classified product
cannot be covered by the extended application rules, a representative specimen incorporating the
particular construction parameter variation shall be tested on both sides or on one side, if the required
classification is from one side only. Otherwise, that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report.
4.1.4 A hardware performance sheet (HPS), according to EN 16035 may be part of the documentation
for the assessment and determination of the extended application.
4.1.5 If the extension of the design parameter variations of Annex A, Table A.1 does not prevent the
doorset from reaching the fully closed position, the rules may be used for a ‘C’ classification, provided
that all test evidence used as a basis has resulted in a ‘C’ classification.”
4.2 How to use extended application rules in Annex A, Table A.1
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original fire resistance test specimen(s) which are required to be
covered by an extended application report.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2)
of Annex A, Table A.1.
4.2.3 Establish from the contents of column (3) of Annex A, Table A.1 whether any extended application
is available beyond the direct application rules (DIAP) in EN 1634-1 without the need for further testing
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report
together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (3) of Annex A, Table A.1.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test
should be made on a representative test specimen, i.e. a doorset of the same or more onerous
configuration. Alternatively, column (4) of Annex A, Table A.1 identifies an option for alternative testing
and relevant test parameters.
The most onerous configuration shall be the one with the lowest relevant performance in terms of mode
of failure and/or highest distortion but shall also be evaluated taking the intended construction
parameter variation(s) into account.
For example, if the construction parameter variation involves a change to glazing or side panel and over
panel configurations then the previous result where these have been tested would need to be used to
make the evaluation of most onerous.
4.2.6 When an additional test according to column (4) of Annex A, Table A.1 is performed and the result
of this additional test meets the provisions given in column (3), the possible extensions in column (3) can
be applied based on this additional test.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide an extended field of application from a single test. However, where a
manufacturer intends to produce a range of doorsets incorporating single leaf doorsets and also double
leaf doorsets with or without side, transom or flush over panels, with or without glazing, with or without
air transfer devices, e.g. ventilation grilles or louvers, with alternative items of building hardware, etc., it
is recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options
in order to minimize the testing required before testing commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the construction parameter variations which are required to be part of the product
range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important design and configuration requirements and incorporate
as many as possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first fire resistance test or a series of tests and then establish which of the original
desired construction parameter variations have not been covered by the fire resistance tests, including
direct application possibilities.
4.3.5 Identify these construction parameter variations in Annex A, Table A.1 and establish if any
extended application is possible without further testing.
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in
column (3) in Annex A, Table A.1.
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired construction parameter variations have not been covered
by the field of direct application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.5.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets, only double leaf doorsets or
both. Where only single leaf doorsets are to be part of the product range, the outstanding construction
parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single leaf doorset. Where only
double leaf doorsets are to be part of the product range, the outstanding construction parameter
variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for double leaf doorsets. Where single leaf and
double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the outstanding construction parameter
variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may be incorporated into either repeated
single leaf doorset fire resistance tests or in the most onerous configuration, as defined in column (4) of
Annex A, Table A.1, double leaf doorset configurations. See also Annex B.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding construction parameter variations from column (1) and
column (2) of Annex A, Table A.1 and observe from column (4) of Annex A, Table A.1 which are the most
onerous specimen configurations for further testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required construction parameter variations has not been covered by
the tests completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate fire resistance test or
tests may be repeated with the additional product variations incorporated.
4.4 Analysis of fire resistance test results
4.4.1 In order to maximize the extended field of application, it is important that the test reports shall
record details of any premature integrity and/or insulation and/or radiation failure, also record details
of any significant distortion to evaluate low, medium and high distortion (see Annex A, Table A.1).
4.4.2 Where a series of fire resistance tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall
be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of fire resistance tests unless
premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variation.
4.4.3 Where it has been possible to clearly identify failures that can be unambiguously assigned to a
specific construction parameter variation, the extended application for all other construction parameter
variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the premature failure(s), provided
the requirements of 4.1.1 are met. Where the specific construction parameter variation requires
category B performance (see EN 1634-1 for the corresponding overrun times) and where failures can be
identified as having no relevance to this aspect of the construction, they can be disregarded, and the
failure time and associated category revised accordingly. In any case, the failed construction parameters
have to be excluded from the classification and EXAP reports.
5 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and
presented in accordance with EN 13501-2.
Annex A
(normative)
Construction parameter variations
Table A.1 is designed to be used in the field of fire resistance testing of hinged and pivoted metal framed
glazed doorsets and openable windows.
The table shall only be used to evaluate a field of extended application when at least one fire resistance
test to EN 1634-1 can generate a fire resistance classification according to EN 13501-2. Only results from
fire resistance tests in accordance with European Standards can be used as basis for extended application.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested. In
the column “Variations”, it could be referenced, in brackets () and in italics, the number of the rule as
previously indicated in EN 15269-5:2014+A1:2016. For example, Table A.1 references (C.1.49) in rule
C.14.1: this means that that rule C.14.1 was referenced as rule C.1.49 in the old version of the standard.
For some construction parameters, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen displayed a high,
medium or low level of distortion during the fire resistance test. Where this is the case, the following
levels shall be used to establish high, medium and low distortion doorsets as measured using the
maximum relative movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf and door frame or
between the meeting edges of door leaves or the relative movement of the framing members for panelled
systems. The measurements shall be taken from the start of the test at any time during the complete
required classification period. The deflections shall be measured at the positions given in EN 1634-1:
— Low: < 40 % of effective rebate depth;
— Medium: ≥ 40 % and ≤ 85 % of effective rebate depth;
— High: > 85 % of effective rebate depth.
Evaluations of the influence of a construction parameter variation on performance characteristics
(E/EW/EI) lead to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application, the results
of which are given in column (3). In certain cases in column (3), it is a requirement to achieve Category B;
the requirements for this are given in EN 1634-1.
Where additional fire resistance tests are deemed to be necessary, the test scenario approved for
incorporation of the construction parameter variation is defined in column (4). Where it is possible to
use information from fire resistance tests performed on one configuration for evidence on a different
configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce the overall number of fire resistance tests
required for extended application evaluation, e.g. from single action doorsets to double action doorsets.
Where an additional test is required in column (4), the test is a full scale test on the most onerous side
(e.g. opening inwards/outwards and/or with glazing beads on fire side) unless it is otherwise specified.
The following test scenarios are defined and referred to in column (4):
Test scenario A: Additional test single or double leaf doorset.
Test scenario B: Additional test single leaf doorset.
Test scenario C: Additional test double leaf doorset.
Test scenario D: Additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets, double
leaf doorsets for double leaf doorset.
Test scenario E: Additional test single leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets, double leaf doorset for
double leaf doorsets.
Test scenario F: Additional test single or double leaf doorset or small scale test according to
EN 1634-2.
Test scenario G: Additional test single or double leaf doorset or small scale test according to
EN 1634-2 opening inwards or opening outwards, not size-dependent.
Test scenario H: Additional test single or double leaf doorset opening inwards or opening
outwards, not size-dependent
In order to maximize the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests the
parameter changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each
parameter depend on the classification required and the preferred direction of testing indicated in
column (4).
Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also be
taken into account.
Where an additional test is required in column 4 of the following tables, the fire resistance test shall be a
full-scale test according to EN 1634-1 at least with the size of the initial test described in 4.1.1 or the
details changed are limited to the tested size unless it is otherwise specified. Where column 4 specifies
that the additional evidence required is “not size-dependent”, the specimen may be tested at any size as
long as the test is in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Interpolations between minimum and maximum size tested of any measure is possible if not otherwise
specified in Table A.1. All the rules in Table A.1 with exception are applicable to doorsets and openable
windows. However, in the text only the word “doorset” is used. The word “doorset” can be replaced by
“openable windows” in every rule.
The rules in Table A.1 influencing the glass dimensions shall respect the rules given in Table A.1, part F.
Table A.1 — Construction parameter variations
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A   Door leaf
In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side, transom and over panels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly
indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction.
A.1  General
A.1.1 Number of leaves - See Single leaf from Not possible without an additional test
Figure A.1 double leaf test
Test scenario B
A.1.2 Number of leaves - See Double leaf from Not possible without an additional test Additional test (s) double leaf

Figure A.1 single leaf test doorset open outwards and
inwards for doorsets with
insulated profiles with glazing
bead in fire side
Open outwards for doorsets
with un-insulated profiles with
glazing bead in fire side
A.1.3 Intumescent seals between Location towards Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
frame and door leaf / leaves - See the frame rebate
Figure A.2 a)
A.1.4 Intumescent seals between Location away Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
frame and door leaf / leaves - See from the frame
Figure A.2 b) rebate
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.5 Intumescent seals between Add Not possible without an additional test  Test scenario D
frame and door leaf / leaves
A.1.6 Intumescent seals between Remove Not possible without an additional test Test scenario D
frame and door leaf / leaves
A.1.7 Intumescent seals between Location Not possible without additional test (s) Additional test (s) double leaf
meeting edges of the door leaves - See doorset open outwards for E
Figure A.3 a) and EW doors
For EI aluminium doors: test
both directions
For EI-steel doors: one test,
with fire on opposite side of
the operated direction. See
Figure A.3 b
A.1.8 Non-intumescent seals Location Any movement possible providing no modifications of the Test scenario A.
between frame and door leaf / leaves construction are required otherwise not possible without
If the seal is positioned
(draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - an additional test
between the meeting edges of
(Reaction to fire class A1)
the door leaves, Test scenario
e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or
C.
frame) - See Figure A.4
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.9 Non-intumescent seals Location No movement possible without an additional test Test scenario C
between meeting edges of the door
leaves (draught / smoke / acoustic
etc.) - (Reaction to fire class A1)
A.1.10 Non-intumescent seals Location No movement possible without an additional test Additional test (s) double leaf
between door leaves and / or frames doorset open outwards for E
(draught /smoke / acoustic etc.) and EW doors
– < Reaction to fire class A1 (fitted in
leaf or frame) - See Figure A.4 a)
For EI aluminium doors: test
both directions
For EI-steel doors: one test,
with fire on opposite side of
the operated direction
See Figure A.4 b
A.1.11 Non-intumescent seals Add Possible for doorsets without intumescent seals and Test scenario A.
between door leaves and / or frames providing the gap between door leaf and door frame is not
If the seal is positioned
(draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - increased otherwise not possible without an additional test
between the meeting edges of
(Reaction to fire class A1),
the door leaves, Test scenario
e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or
C.
frame) - See Figure A.5 a)
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.12 Non-intumescent seals Remove Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A.
between door leaves and / or frames
If the seal is positioned
(draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) -
between the meeting edges of
(Reaction to fire class A1),
the door leaves, Test scenario
e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or
C.
frame) - See Figure A.6
A.1.13 Non-intumescent seals Add Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A.
between door leaves and / or frames
If the seal is positioned
(draught / smoke / acoustic etc.)
between the meeting edges of
– < Reaction to fire class A1 (fitted in
the door leaves, Test scenario
leaf or frame) - See Figure A.5 a
C.
Fireside opposite the position
where the seal is added.
See Figure A.5 b)
A.1.14 Non-intumescent seals Remove Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A.
between door leaves and / or frames
If the seal is positioned
(draught / smoke / acoustic etc.
between the meeting edges of
– < Reaction to fire class A1 (fitted in
the door leaves, Test scenario
leaf or frame) – See Figure A.6
C.
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.15 Rebate (door leaves to frames) Add Insulated profiles:
- See Figure A.10
Not possible without an additional test unless the original Test scenario E
test had additional thermocouples positioned on the profile
maximum 100 mm and/or 25 mm from the edge of the
notional rebate (i.e. 100-x) where x means the width of the
added rebate and dimension y shall not be reduced,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
Un-insulated profiles:
Not possible without an additional test
A.1.16 Rebate (meeting edges) - Add (one rebate) Insulated profiles: Test scenario E (added rebate
See Figure A.11 Not possible without an additional test unless the original away from the fire)
test had additional thermocouples positioned on the profile
maximum 100 mm and/or 25 mm from the edge of the
notional rebate (i.e. 100-x) where x means the width of the
added rebate and dimension y shall not be reduced.
Otherwise not possible without an additional test
Un-insulated profiles:
Not possible without an additional test
A.1.17 Rebate (door leaves to frames Remove Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
and meeting edges) - See Figure A.12

Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.18 Latched condition for single Change in Possible in line with the following relationship: Additional test to include the
and double leaf doorsets latching condition required latching condition

tested without a tested tested
lock with a with a
latch/lock latch/lock
but latched
unlatched
extension to: — possible not
without a possible
lock/latch
extension to: not possible for — not
lock with EI doors. possible possible
lock/latch but for E or EW
unlocked/ doorsets if
unlatched latch/lock is all
metal
construction
extension to: not possible for possible —
with a EI doors. possible
lock/latch, for E or EW
latched doorsets if
latch/lock is all
metal
construction
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.19 Latching / locking Remove from Not possible without an additional test For single leaf doorsets
door leaf tested additional test single leaf
with latching / doorset (open inwards for EI
locking doors, open outwards for E or
EW doors) for double leaf
doorsets additional test double
leaf doorset (open inwards for
EI doors, open outwards for E
or EW doors
A.2 Size variations
If there is any variation in the width and height of the door leaf (leaves), this should be reflected in the relative size variation of the door frame without
modifying the original gaps. If there is any variation in the thickness of the door leaf (leaves), this should be reflected in the relative variation of the
rebate width of the frame.
A.2.1 Size (area, width, height) all Decrease E and EW unlimited reduction is Possible Test scenario D
distortions
EI: possible to decrease to a minimum dimension of the
glass as it is mentioned in rule F.1.4
Otherwise not possible without an additional test
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.2.2 Height – all distortions Increase Possible for doorsets have achieved category B up to 15 %
or Test scenario D
possible for doorsets which have achieved category B and

medium and low distortion up to 20 % providing overlap of
door leaf to frame header is not reduced and distance
between top hinge and top of door leaf is equal to or less
than tested and additional for EW a thermal emission
calculation in accordance with EN 15254-4 within the
15 kW limit (Rule F.1.3 applies)

Otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.2.3 Width - all distortions Increase Possible for doorsets which have achieved category B up to Test scenario D
15 %
or
Possible for doorsets which have achieved category B and
medium and low distortion up to 20 %

Providing overlap of door leaf to frame jamb is not reduced
and additional (for EW) thermal emission calculation in
accordance with EN 15254-4 within the 15 kW limit Rule
F.1.3 applies
Otherwise not possible without an additional test
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.2.4 Area - all distortions Increase Possible for doorsets which have achieved category B up to Additional test, see A.2.2
20 % and/or A.2.3
or
Possible for doorsets which have achieved category B and
medium and low distortion up to 21 %

Providing overlap of door leaf to frame header is not
reduced and distance between top hinge and top of the door
leaf is equal to or less than tested)

and additional (for EW)
a thermal emission calculation in accordance with
EN 15254-4 within the 15 kW limit Rule F.1.3 applies

Otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.3. Materials and constructions
A.3.1 Type of infill of profile of core Change of Possible
material in the panel (single supplier /
thickness or in combination of manufacturer of
different layers) identical material
with identical
composition and
properties
A.3.2 Type of core material in the Alternative Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
panel (single thickness or in composition

combination of different layers)
Additional evidence
Construction parameter Variation Possibility of extension
required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Not possible without an additional test Test scenario D
A.3.3 Infill of the door leaf profile Add

Not possible without an additional test Test scenario D
A.3.4 Infill of the door leaf profile Remove

A.3.5 Amount of adhesive (excluded Increase Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
corner connection) / m – organic
based ( A.3.6 Amount of adhesive (excluded Decrease Possible down to 50 % Test scenario A
corner connection) / m – organic
Otherwise not possible without an additional test
based ( A.3.7 Amount of adhesive (excluded Increase Possible
corner connection) / m – inorganic
based (Reaction to fire class A1)
A.3.8 amount of adhesive (excluded Decrease Not possible without an additional test Test scenario A
corner connection) / m – inorganic
based (Reaction to fire class A1)
A.3.9 Type of adhesive Change of Pos
...