This document covers the track and trace events for the return flow of e-Commerce items, more specifically, the events that are most useful to the original recipient (if any) and the E-Commerce company that sent the item in the first place.
It provides a minimum set of events formulated in language that is understood by sellers and buyers of E-Commerce products. The logistic service providers (LSPs) involved can "map" their own internal events to the events described in this document.
A return flow is always linked to a forward flow that is the subject of CEN/TS 18055-1.
This document aims to describe only those events that are related to the returns flow. Therefore, this document defines and describes the exact moment that the forward flows stop and the associated return flow starts.
This document covers the following four cases of return flows:
-   unsuccessful delivery (item remains in possession of the last mile operator);
-   return to sender or equivalent party (delivered and later returned parcel);
-   a service for recipients to send (parts of) a received shipment back;
-   returns caused by failure to meet regulatory or cross-border procedure requirements.
Each of these cases will be covered in separate clauses of the document.
NOTE   There are some processes in case 3 that need to occur before the parcel enters into the Returns Flow and they are generally executed by the E-Commerce company (or a party acting on its behalf) ).
This document will not describe those "precursor" processes in any detail, but it will describe the minimum requirements in terms of information needed by the first LSP to be able to start to execute the Return Flow effectively and efficiently. The precursor process is similar to the RMA (= Return Materials Authorization) process used in business-to-business environments.
This document does not cover the logistical flows within the facilities of the producers and sellers of the items. These fall outside the responsibility of the CEN/TC 331 domain.
This document does not cover all events necessary for an LSP to track items within its own facilities.

  • Technical specification
    34 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document covers the track and trace events for the return flow of e-Commerce items, more specifically, the events that are most useful to the original recipient (if any) and the E-Commerce company that sent the item in the first place.
It provides a minimum set of events formulated in language that is understood by sellers and buyers of E-Commerce products. The logistic service providers (LSPs) involved can "map" their own internal events to the events described in this document.
A return flow is always linked to a forward flow that is the subject of CEN/TS 18055-1.
This document aims to describe only those events that are related to the returns flow. Therefore, this document defines and describes the exact moment that the forward flows stop and the associated return flow starts.
This document covers the following four cases of return flows:
-   unsuccessful delivery (item remains in possession of the last mile operator);
-   return to sender or equivalent party (delivered and later returned parcel);
-   a service for recipients to send (parts of) a received shipment back;
-   returns caused by failure to meet regulatory or cross-border procedure requirements.
Each of these cases will be covered in separate clauses of the document.
NOTE   There are some processes in case 3 that need to occur before the parcel enters into the Returns Flow and they are generally executed by the E-Commerce company (or a party acting on its behalf) ).
This document will not describe those "precursor" processes in any detail, but it will describe the minimum requirements in terms of information needed by the first LSP to be able to start to execute the Return Flow effectively and efficiently. The precursor process is similar to the RMA (= Return Materials Authorization) process used in business-to-business environments.
This document does not cover the logistical flows within the facilities of the producers and sellers of the items. These fall outside the responsibility of the CEN/TC 331 domain.
This document does not cover all events necessary for an LSP to track items within its own facilities.

  • Technical specification
    34 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

The scope of this document is the forward flow of E-Commerce items. Starting point is arrival at a lo-gistic service provider, end point is the final delivery, or at least the attempt to final delivery.
The returns flows, either caused by unsuccessful delivery, "return to sender" or as a service for recipi-ents to send a received shipment back, are not covered by the forward events. To keep this document unambiguous and easy to understand, these return flows are excluded. Return flows may be covered in a separate technical specification.
Not in scope are the logistical flows within the facilities of the producers and sellers of the items. These fall outside the responsibility of the CEN/TC 331 domain.
Excluded as well, are all events necessary for an LSP to track items within its own facilities. It is up to the LSP how to run its business, and internal standards are in place for the management of internal process-es. Internal events are considered to be of no interest to a recipient, with the exception of some of the last mile events which are mentioned later in this document.

  • Technical specification
    20 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

The scope of this document is the forward flow of E-Commerce items. Starting point is arrival at a lo-gistic service provider, end point is the final delivery, or at least the attempt to final delivery.
The returns flows, either caused by unsuccessful delivery, "return to sender" or as a service for recipi-ents to send a received shipment back, are not covered by the forward events. To keep this document unambiguous and easy to understand, these return flows are excluded. Return flows may be covered in a separate technical specification.
Not in scope are the logistical flows within the facilities of the producers and sellers of the items. These fall outside the responsibility of the CEN/TC 331 domain.
Excluded as well, are all events necessary for an LSP to track items within its own facilities. It is up to the LSP how to run its business, and internal standards are in place for the management of internal process-es. Internal events are considered to be of no interest to a recipient, with the exception of some of the last mile events which are mentioned later in this document.

  • Technical specification
    20 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document specifies new methods available to customers from the logistic transportation companies for safe secure and contactless delivery of postal items.
The methods specified in this document provides the senders and the receivers with a proof of receipt or proof that an attempt of delivery was made. It includes methods on how to deliver without having the customer to sign for the delivery.
More specifically, the methods specified in this document cover the process of last mile delivery of postal items, including home delivery and delivery at public places, residential buildings and corporate buildings.
This document describes all delivery methods, including those requiring physical contact, and rank them from a health and safety, and operational point of view.

  • Technical report
    18 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document specifies new methods available to customers from the logistic transportation companies for safe secure and contactless delivery of postal items.
The methods specified in this document provides the senders and the receivers with a proof of receipt or proof that an attempt of delivery was made. It includes methods on how to deliver without having the customer to sign for the delivery.
More specifically, the methods specified in this document cover the process of last mile delivery of postal items, including home delivery and delivery at public places, residential buildings and corporate buildings.
This document describes all delivery methods, including those requiring physical contact, and rank them from a health and safety, and operational point of view.

  • Technical report
    18 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document describes methods and requirements for proof of delivery replacing the physical signature, while being as secure and trustworthy as physical signatures.
It applies to situations where the traditional, physical signature is required by the service to be provided and where this traditional physical signature is not required by regulation.
It applies to parcels delivered to recipients by postal operators and Logistic Service Providers (LSP).
This document aims to meet or exceed the level of confidence associated with traditional, physical signatures.
The new proof of delivery process will ascertain that the item is delivered to an authorized recipient or receiver and also prove that the recipient accepted the delivery.
This document includes only the delivery process (forward flow).

  • Draft
    11 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document establishes a common methodology for the calculation, allocation and declaration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as well as air pollutant emissions related to any parcel delivery service.
It only covers a part of the entire retail value chain. The retail value chain usually consists of creating the product, storing the inventory, distributing the goods and making the product available for consumers.
This document includes only the distribution of goods but considers the entire value chain of the parcel transportation process flow, namely the collection and delivery rounds, the trunking and the operations due to processing and the physical handling of parcels. See Figure 1 below for a graphical illustration.
Figure 1 - Overview of parcel delivery operations

  • Draft
    79 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document describes methods and requirements for proof of delivery replacing the physical signature, while being as secure and trustworthy as physical signatures.
It applies to situations where the traditional, physical signature is required by the service to be provided and where this traditional physical signature is not required by regulation.
It applies to parcels delivered to recipients by postal operators and Logistic Service Providers (LSP).
This document aims to meet or exceed the level of confidence associated with traditional, physical signatures.
The new proof of delivery process will ascertain that the item is delivered to an authorized recipient or receiver and also prove that the recipient accepted the delivery.
This document includes only the delivery process (forward flow).

  • Draft
    11 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

This document establishes a common methodology for the calculation, allocation and declaration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as well as air pollutant emissions related to any parcel delivery service.
It only covers a part of the entire retail value chain. The retail value chain usually consists of creating the product, storing the inventory, distributing the goods and making the product available for consumers.
This document includes only the distribution of goods but considers the entire value chain of the parcel transportation process flow, namely the collection and delivery rounds, the trunking and the operations due to processing and the physical handling of parcels. See Figure 1 below for a graphical illustration.
Figure 1 - Overview of parcel delivery operations

  • Draft
    79 pages
    English language
    e-Library read for

Frequently Asked Questions

A European Standardization Mandate is a formal request from the European Commission to the European Standardization Organizations (CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI) to develop European standards (ENs) in support of EU legislation and policies. Mandates are issued under Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 and help ensure that products and services meet the essential requirements set out in EU directives and regulations.

M/590 is a European Standardization Mandate titled "standardisation request to the European Committee for Standardisation as regards postal services and the improvement of quality of service in support of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997". standardisation request to the European Committee for Standardisation as regards postal services and the improvement of quality of service in support of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 There are 10 standards developed under this mandate.

Standards developed in response to a mandate and cited in the Official Journal of the European Union become "harmonized standards". Products manufactured in compliance with harmonized standards benefit from a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the corresponding EU directive or regulation, facilitating CE marking and market access across the European Economic Area.