Metallic materials — Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components

In fracture assessments of steel structures containing cracks, it has generally been assumed that the fracture resistance of fracture toughness specimens is equal to the fracture resistance of structural components. However, such an assumption often leads to excessively conservative fracture assessments. This is due to a loss of plastic constraint in structural components, which are subjected mainly to tensile loading. By contrast, fracture toughness specimens hold a constrained stress state near the crack-tip due to bending mode. The loss of constraint is significant for high strength steels with high yield-to-tensile ratios (= yield stress/tensile strength) which have been extensively developed and widely applied to structures in recent years. ISO 27306:2016 specifies a method for converting the CTOD (crack-tip opening displacement) fracture toughness obtained from laboratory specimens to an equivalent CTOD for structural components, taking constraint loss into account. This method can also apply to fracture assessment using the stress intensity factor or the J-integral concept (see Clause 9). ISO 27306:2016 deals with the unstable fracture that occurs from a crack-like defect or fatigue crack in ferritic structural steels. Unstable fracture accompanied by a significant amount of ductile crack extension and ductile fractures are not included in the scope hereof. The CTOD fracture toughness of structural steels is measured in accordance with the established test methods, ISO 12135[1] or BS 7448-1. The fracture assessment of a cracked component is done using an established method such as FAD (Failure Assessment Diagram) in the organization concerned, and reference is not made to the details thereof in ISO 27306:2016. It can be used for eliminating the excessive conservatism frequently associated with the conventional fracture mechanics methods and accurately assessing the unstable fracture initiation limit of structural components from the fracture toughness of the structural steel. This is also used for rationally determining the fracture toughness of materials to meet the design requirements of performance of structural components.

Matériaux métalliques — Méthode de correction de perte de contrainte du CTOD de la ténacité à la rupture pour l'évaluation de la rupture des composants en acier

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
18-Sep-2016
Current Stage
9093 - International Standard confirmed
Start Date
03-Oct-2022
Completion Date
19-Apr-2025
Ref Project

Relations

Standard
ISO 27306:2016 - Metallic materials -- Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components
English language
49 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
ISO 27306:2016 - Metallic materials -- Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components
English language
49 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ISO/DIS 27306
ISO/TC 164/SC 4 Secretariat: ANSI
Voting begins on: Voting terminates on:
2015-07-29 2015-10-29
Metallic materials — Method of constraint loss correction
of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of
steel components
Matériaux métalliques — Méthode de correction de perte de contrainte du CTOD de la ténacité à la rupture
pour l’évaluation de la rupture des composants en acier
ICS: 77.040.10
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS
THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY
NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
Reference number
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO/DIS 27306:2015(E)
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
©
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. ISO 2015

ISO/DIS 27306:2015(E)
© ISO 2015
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2015 – All rights reserved

ISO 27306
Contents
Foreword. iv
1. Scope . 1
2. Normative references . 1
3. Terms and definitions . 2
4. Symbols and units . 3
5. Principle . 4
6. Structural components of concern. 5
7. Range of use . 5
8. Assessment levels I, II, and III . 6
8.1 General . 6
8.2 Level I: Simplified assessment . 6
8.3 Level II: Normal assessment . 6
8.4 Level III: Material specific assessment . 7
9. Equivalent CTOD ratio,  . 7
9.1 General . 7
9.2 Factors influencing the equivalent CTOD ratio,  . 7
9.3 Procedure for calculating the equivalent CTOD ratio, , at assessment levels I to III . 8
9.3.1 General . 8
9.3.2 Surface crack cases (CSCP and ESCP) . 8
9.3.3 Through-thickness crack cases (CTCP and ETCP) . 9
Annex A (Informative) Procedure for the selection of Weibull parameter, m, at level II assessment . 16
Annex B (Informative) Analytical method for the determination of Weibull parameter, m, at level III
assessment . 18
Annex C (Informative) Guidelines for the equivalent CTOD ratio,  . 23
Annex D (Informative) Examples of fracture assessment using the equivalent CTOD ratio,  . 29
Bibliography . 43

ISO 27306:2009 (E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO
member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical
committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has
the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in
liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted
by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International
Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
ISO/DIS 27306 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 164 Mechanical Testing of Metals.
iv © ISO 2009– All rights reserved

ISO 27306
Metallic materials - Method of constraint loss correction of CTOD
fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel components
1. Scope
In fracture assessments of steel structures containing cracks, it has generally been assumed that the fracture
resistance of fracture toughness specimens is equal to the fracture resistance of structural components. However,
such an assumption often leads to excessively conservative fracture assessments. This is due to a loss of plastic
constraint in structural components, which are subjected mainly to tensile loading. By contrast, fracture toughness
specimens hold a constrained stress state near the crack-tip due to bending mode. The loss of constraint is
significant for high strength steels with high yield-to-tensile ratios (= yield stress / tensile strength) which have been
extensively developed and widely applied to structures in recent years.
This International Standard specifies a method for converting the CTOD (Crack-Tip Opening Displacement) fracture
toughness obtained from laboratory specimens to an equivalent CTOD for structural components, taking constraint
loss into account. This method can also apply to fracture assessment using the stress intensity factor or the J-
integral concept (see Clause 9).
This International Standard deals with the unstable fracture that occurs from a crack-like defect or fatigue crack in
ferritic structural steels. Unstable fracture accompanied by a significant amount of ductile crack extension and ductile
fractures are not included in the scope hereof.
The CTOD fracture toughness of structural steels is measured in accordance with the established test methods, ISO
12135:2002 or BS7448-1:1999. The fracture assessment of a cracked component is done using an established
method such as FAD (Failure Assessment Diagram) in the organization concerned, and reference is not made to the
details thereof in this International Standard.
This International Standard can be used for eliminating the excessive conservatism frequently associated with the
conventional fracture mechanics methods and accurately assessing the unstable fracture initiation limit of structural
components from the fracture toughness of the structural steel. This is also used for rationally determining the
fracture toughness of materials to meet the design requirements of deformability of structural components.
2. Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this International Standard. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For updated references, the latest edition of the referenced document
(including any amendments) applies.
ISO 12135:2002(E), Metallic materials – Unified method of test of the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness
BSI, BS7448-1:1991, Fracture mechanics toughness tests, Method for determination of K , critical CTOD and critical
Ic
J values of metallic materials

ISO 27306:2009 (E)
3. Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 12135:2002 and the following apply.
3.1
CTOD of standard fracture toughness specimen
crack-tip opening displacement of standard fracture toughness specimen

CTOD, as the fracture driving force, for the standard fracture toughness specimen (three point bend or compact
specimen) with 0,45 ≤ a / W ≤ 0,55, where a and W are the initial crack length and specimen width, respectively
0 0
3.2
CTOD fracture toughness
crack-tip opening displacement fracture toughness

cr
critical CTOD at the onset of brittle fracture in the standard fracture toughness specimen [ (B) as defined in ISO
c
12135:2002] with 0,45 ≤ a / W ≤ 0,55
3.3
CTOD of structural component
crack-tip opening displacement of structural component

WP
CTOD, as the fracture driving force, for a through-thickness crack or a surface crack existing in a structural
component regarded as a wide plate
NOTE The CTOD of a surface crack is defined at the maximum crack depth.
3.4
critical CTOD of structural component
critical crack-tip opening displacement of structural component

WP,cr
critical CTOD at the onset of brittle fracture in structural components
3.5
equivalent CTOD ratio
equivalent crack-tip opening displacement ratio

CTOD ratio defined by / , where  and  are CTODs of the standard fracture toughness specimen and the
WP WP
structural component, respectively, at the same level of the Weibull stress 
W
See Figure 1.
NOTE See Reference [1].
3.6
Weibull stress

W
fracture driving force defined with the consideration of statistical instability of microcracks in the fracture process zone
against brittle fracture
NOTE See Reference [2].
3.7
critical Weibull stress

W,cr
Weibull stress at the onset of unstable fracture
3.8
Weibull shape parameter
m
2 © ISO 2008 – All rights reserved

ISO 27306
material parameter used in the definition of the Weibull stress; one of two parameters describing the statistical
distribution of the critical Weibull stress, 
W, cr
3.9
yield-to-tensile ratio
R
Y
ratio of yield strength,  , (lower yield point, R , or 0,2% proof strength, R ) to tensile strength, R
Y eL p0,2 m
4. Symbols and units
For the purposes of this document, the following symbols, units, and designations are applied in addition to those in
ISO 12135:2002.
Symbol Unit Designation
a mm Depth of surface crack or half length of through-thickness crack in structural component
c mm Half length of surface crack in structural component
m 1 Weibull shape parameter
t mm Plate thickness
V mm Reference volume defined for Weibull stress
V mm Volume of fracture process zone
f
R - Yield-to-tensile ratio (= / R )
Y m
Y
Equivalent CTOD ratio
 -
Equivalent CTOD ratio for reference crack length
-

(In cases of surface crack panel, is defined for plate thickness t = 25 mm.)
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of centre surface crack or double-edge surface
 -
2c, t
crack on target plate thickness
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of centre through-thickness crack or double-
 -
a
edge through-thickness crack
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of single-edge surface crack on target plate
-

c, t
thickness
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of single-edge through-thickness crack
 -
a
 mm CTOD of standard fracture toughness specimen
Critical CTOD of standard fracture toughness specimen at onset of brittle fracture
mm

cr
(CTOD fracture toughness)
CTOD at small-scale yielding limit for standard fracture toughness specimen
 mm
SSY limit
 mm CTOD of structural component
WP
mm Critical CTOD of structural component at onset of brittle fracture

WP, cr
Effective stress used for the calculation of Weibull stress
 MPa
eff
MPa Lower yield point, R , or 0,2 % proof strength, R
  eL p0,2
Y
Weibull stress
 MPa
W
Critical Weibull stress at onset of brittle fracture
 MPa
W, cr
ISO 27306:2009 (E)
5. Principle
This International Standard deals with the initiation of unstable fracture due to cleavage of structural steels. It
presents a method for converting the CTOD fracture toughness obtained from the standard fracture toughness
specimen [three-point bend or compact specimen with 0,45 ≤ a / W ≤ 0,5
...


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 27306
Second edition
2016-09-15
Metallic materials — Method of
constraint loss correction of CTOD
fracture toughness for fracture
assessment of steel components
Matériaux métalliques — Méthode de correction de perte de
contrainte du CTOD de la ténacité à la rupture pour l’évaluation de la
rupture des composants en acier
Reference number
©
ISO 2016
© ISO 2016, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Symbols and units . 3
5 Principle . 3
6 Structural components of concern . 4
7 Conditions for use . 5
8 Assessment levels I, II, and III . 6
8.1 General . 6
8.2 Level I: Simplified assessment . 6
8.3 Level II: Normal assessment . 7
8.4 Level III: Material specific assessment . 7
9 Equivalent CTOD ratio, β. 7
9.1 General . 7
9.2 Factors influencing the equivalent CTOD ratio, β .7
9.3 Procedure for calculating the equivalent CTOD ratio, β, at assessment levels I to III . 8
9.3.1 General. 8
9.3.2 Surface crack cases (CSCP and ESCP) . 8
9.3.3 Through-thickness crack cases (CTCP and ETCP) . 9
Annex A (informative) Procedure for the selection of Weibull parameter, m, at level
II assessment .17
Annex B (informative) Analytical method for the determination of Weibull parameter, m, at
level III assessment .19
Annex C (informative) Guidelines for the equivalent CTOD ratio, β .24
Annex D (informative) Examples of fracture assessment using the equivalent CTOD ratio, β .31
Bibliography .47
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 164 Mechanical Testing of Metals, Subcommittee
SC 4, Toughness testing — Fracture (F), Pendulum (P), Tear (T).
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 27306:2009), which has been technically
revised.
iv © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 27306:2016(E)
Metallic materials — Method of constraint loss correction
of CTOD fracture toughness for fracture assessment of steel
components
1 Scope
In fracture assessments of steel structures containing cracks, it has generally been assumed that
the fracture resistance of fracture toughness specimens is equal to the fracture resistance of
structural components. However, such an assumption often leads to excessively conservative fracture
assessments. This is due to a loss of plastic constraint in structural components, which are subjected
mainly to tensile loading. By contrast, fracture toughness specimens hold a constrained stress state
near the crack-tip due to bending mode. The loss of constraint is significant for high strength steels with
high yield-to-tensile ratios (= yield stress/tensile strength) which have been extensively developed and
widely applied to structures in recent years.
This International Standard specifies a method for converting the CTOD (crack-tip opening
displacement) fracture toughness obtained from laboratory specimens to an equivalent CTOD for
structural components, taking constraint loss into account. This method can also apply to fracture
assessment using the stress intensity factor or the J-integral concept (see Clause 9).
This International Standard deals with the unstable fracture that occurs from a crack-like defect or
fatigue crack in ferritic structural steels. Unstable fracture accompanied by a significant amount of
ductile crack extension and ductile fractures are not included in the scope hereof.
The CTOD fracture toughness of structural steels is measured in accordance with the established test
1)
methods, ISO 12135 or BS 7448-1. The fracture assessment of a cracked component is done using an
established method such as FAD (Failure Assessment Diagram) in the organization concerned, and
reference is not made to the details thereof in this International Standard.
This International Standard can be used for eliminating the excessive conservatism frequently
associated with the conventional fracture mechanics methods and accurately assessing the unstable
fracture initiation limit of structural components from the fracture toughness of the structural steel.
This is also used for rationally determining the fracture toughness of materials to meet the design
requirements of performance of structural components.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this International
Standard. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For updated references, the latest edition
of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 12135, Metallic materials — Unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture
toughness
BS 7448-1, Fracture mechanics toughness tests —Part 1: Method for determination of K , critical CTOD
Ic
and critical J values of metallic materials
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 12135 and the following apply.
1) To be published.
3.1
CTOD of standard fracture toughness specimen
crack-tip opening displacement of standard fracture toughness specimen
δ
CTOD, as the fracture driving force, for the standard fracture toughness specimen (three-point bend or
compact specimen) with 0,45 ≤ a /W ≤ 0,55, where a and W are the initial crack length and specimen
0 0
width, respectively
3.2
CTOD fracture toughness
crack-tip opening displacement fracture toughness
δ
cr
critical CTOD at the onset of brittle fracture in the standard fracture toughness specimen [δ (B) as
c
defined in ISO 12135] with 0,45 ≤ a /W ≤ 0,55
3.3
CTOD of structural component
crack-tip opening displacement of structural component
δ
WP
CTOD, as the fracture driving force, for a through-thickness crack or a surface crack existing in a
structural component regarded as a wide plate
Note 1 to entry: The CTOD of a surface crack is defined at the maximum crack depth.
3.4
critical CTOD of structural component
critical crack-tip opening displacement of structural component
δ
WP,cr
critical CTOD at the onset of brittle fracture in structural components
3.5
equivalent CTOD ratio
equivalent crack-tip opening displacement ratio
β
CTOD ratio defined by δ/δ , where δ and δ are CTODs of the standard fracture toughness specimen
WP WP
and the structural component, respectively, at the same level of the Weibull stress σ
W
Note 1 to entry: See Figure 1.
Note 2 to entry: See Reference [1].
3.6
Weibull stress
σ
W
fracture driving force defined with the consideration of statistical instability of microcracks in the
fracture process zone against brittle fracture
Note 1 to entry: See Reference [2].
3.7
critical Weibull stress
σ
W,cr
Weibull stress at the onset of unstable fracture
3.8
Weibull shape parameter
m
material parameter used in the definition of the Weibull stress; one of two parameters describing the
statistical distribution of the critical Weibull stress, σ
W, cr
2 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

3.9
yield-to-tensile ratio
R
Y
ratio of yield strength, σ , (lower yield point, R , or 0,2% proof strength, R ) to tensile strength, R
Y eL p0,2 m
4 Symbols and units
For the purposes of this document, the following symbols, units, and designations are applied in
addition to those in ISO 12135.
Symbol Unit Designation
a mm Depth of surface crack or half-length of through-thickness crack in structural component
c mm Half-length of surface crack in structural component
m — Weibull shape parameter
t mm Plate thickness
V mm Reference volume defined for Weibull stress
V mm Volume of fracture process zone
f
R — Yield-to-tensile ratio (= σ /R )
Y Y m
β — Equivalent CTOD ratio
Equivalent CTOD ratio for reference crack length
β —
(In cases of surface crack panel, β is defined for plate thickness t = 25 mm.)
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of centre surface crack or double-edge surface crack
β —
2c, t
on target plate thickness
Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of centre through-thickness crack or double-edge
β —
2a
through-thickness crack
β — Equivalent CTOD ratio for target length of single-edge surface crack on target plate thickness
c,
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.