Standard Test Method for Determination of the Weight Percent Individual Volatile Organic Compounds in Waterborne Air-Dry Coatings by Gas Chromatography

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 In using Practice D3960 to measure the volatile organic compound content of waterborne coatings, precision can be poor for low volatile organic compound content air-dry coatings if the volatile organic weight percent is determined indirectly. The present method directly identifies and then quantifies the weight percent of individual volatile organic compounds in air-dry coatings (Note 6). The total volatile organic weight percent can be obtained by adding the individual weight percent values (Note 7).
Note 6: The present method may be used to speciate solvent-borne air-dry coatings. However, since these normally contain high, and often complex, quantities of solvent, precision tends to be better using other methods contained in Practice D3960, where the volatile fraction is determined by a direct weight loss determination.
Note 7: Detectable compounds may result from thermal decomposition in a hot injection port or from reaction with the extraction solvent. If it can be shown that a material is a decomposition product, or is the result of a reaction with the extraction solvent, then results for that compound should be discounted from the volatile measured by Test Method D6886.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is for the determination of the weight percent of individual volatile organic compounds in waterborne air-dry coatings (Note 1).  
1.2 This method may be used for the analysis of coatings containing silanes, siloxanes, and silane-siloxane blends.  
1.3 This method is not suitable for the analysis of coatings that cure by chemical reaction (this includes two-component coatings and coatings which cure when heated) because the dilution herein required will impede the chemical reaction required for these types of coatings.  
1.4 Precision statistics for this method have been determined for waterborne coatings in which the volatile organic compound weight percent is below 5 percent. The method has been used successfully with higher organic content waterborne coatings and with solventborne coatings (Note 2).  
1.5 This method may also be used to measure the exempt volatile organic compound content (for example, acetone, methyl acetate, t-butyl acetate and p-chlorobenzotrifluoride) of waterborne and solvent-borne coatings. Check local regulations for a list of exempt compounds. The methodology is virtually identical to that used in Test Method D6133 which, as written, is specific for only exempt volatile compounds.  
1.6 Volatile compounds that are present at the 0.005 weight percent level (50 ppm) or greater can be determined. A procedure for doing so is given in Section 9.  
1.7 Volatile organic compound content of a coating can be calculated using data from Test Method D6886 but requires other data (see Appendix X2.)
Note 1: Data from this method will not always provide the volatile organic compound content of a paint film equivalent to EPA Method 24. Some compounds and some semi-volatile compounds may be considered volatile using the GC conditions specified but will not fully volatilize during the one hour at 110°C conditions of EPA Method 24. Some or all of these materials remain in the paint film and therefore are not considered volatile organic compounds according to EPA Method 24. In addition, some compounds may decompose at the high inlet temperature of the GC. However, note the EPA Method 24 has poor precision and accuracy at low levels of volatile organic compounds.
Note 2: This method measures volatile organic compound weight of air-dry coatings directly as opposed to other methods in Practice D3960 which measure the volatile organic compound weight percent indirectly. A direct measurement of the weight percent particularly in low volatile organic compound content waterborne coatings, generally gives better precision. California Polytechnic State University carried out an extensive study for the California Air Resources Board comparing the precision of the direct method...

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Sep-2018
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Standard
ASTM D6886-18 - Standard Test Method for Determination of the Weight Percent Individual Volatile Organic Compounds in Waterborne Air-Dry Coatings by Gas Chromatography
English language
11 pages
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard
REDLINE ASTM D6886-18 - Standard Test Method for Determination of the Weight Percent Individual Volatile Organic Compounds in Waterborne Air-Dry Coatings by Gas Chromatography
English language
11 pages
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D6886 − 18
Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Weight Percent Individual Volatile
Organic Compounds in Waterborne Air-Dry Coatings by Gas
Chromatography
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6886; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
during the one hour at 110°C conditions of EPA Method 24. Some or all
1. Scope
ofthesematerialsremaininthepaintfilmandthereforearenotconsidered
1.1 This test method is for the determination of the weight
volatile organic compounds according to EPA Method 24. In addition,
percent of individual volatile organic compounds in water- some compounds may decompose at the high inlet temperature of the GC.
However, note the EPAMethod 24 has poor precision and accuracy at low
borne air-dry coatings (Note 1).
levels of volatile organic compounds.
1.2 This method may be used for the analysis of coatings
NOTE 2—This method measures volatile organic compound weight of
containing silanes, siloxanes, and silane-siloxane blends. air-dry coatings directly as opposed to other methods in Practice D3960
whichmeasurethevolatileorganiccompoundweightpercentindirectly.A
1.3 This method is not suitable for the analysis of coatings
direct measurement of the weight percent particularly in low volatile
that cure by chemical reaction (this includes two-component
organic compound content waterborne coatings, generally gives better
precision. California Polytechnic State University carried out an extensive
coatings and coatings which cure when heated) because the
study for the California Air Resources Board comparing the precision of
dilution herein required will impede the chemical reaction
the direct method with the indirect method (CARB Standard Agreement
required for these types of coatings.
No. 04.329) Detailed results of this study may be found at http://
www.arb.ca.gov/coatings/arch/Final_Report_6_11_09.pdf. This study
1.4 Precision statistics for this method have been deter-
may be used to decide if the present method or other methods in Practice
mined for waterborne coatings in which the volatile organic
D3960 are preferred for a specific coating.
compound weight percent is below 5 percent. The method has
1.8 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
been used successfully with higher organic content waterborne
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
coatings and with solventborne coatings (Note 2).
standard.
1.5 This method may also be used to measure the exempt
1.9 This standard does not purport to address all of the
volatile organic compound content (for example, acetone,
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
methyl acetate, t-butyl acetate and p-chlorobenzotrifluoride) of
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
waterborne and solvent-borne coatings. Check local regula-
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
tions for a list of exempt compounds. The methodology is
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
virtually identical to that used inTest Method D6133 which, as
1.10 This international standard was developed in accor-
written, is specific for only exempt volatile compounds.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
1.6 Volatile compounds that are present at the 0.005 weight
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
percent level (50 ppm) or greater can be determined. A
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
procedure for doing so is given in Section 9.
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
1.7 Volatile organic compound content of a coating can be
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
calculated using data from Test Method D6886 but requires
other data (see Appendix X2.)
2. Referenced Documents
NOTE 1—Data from this method will not always provide the volatile
2.1 ASTM Standards:
organic compound content of a paint film equivalent to EPA Method 24.
D1475 Test Method for Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks,
Some compounds and some semi-volatile compounds may be considered
volatile using the GC conditions specified but will not fully volatilize and Related Products
D2369 Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint
and Related Coatings, Materials, andApplications and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.21 on Chemical Analysis of Paints and Paint Materials. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2018. Published October 2018. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
ɛ1
approved in 2003. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as D6886 – 14 . DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/D6886-18. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D6886 − 18
D3792 Test Method forWater Content of Coatings by Direct 3.1.19 SPDE—solid phase dynamic extraction
Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph
3.1.20 THF—tetrahydrofuran
D3925 Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related
3.1.21 TMPD-IB—2,2,4-trimethypentane-1,3-diol,
Pigmented Coatings
monoisobutyrate
D3960 PracticeforDeterminingVolatileOrganicCompound
(VOC) Content of Paints and Related Coatings
3.1.22 TMPD-DIB—2,2,4-trimethypentane-1,3-diol, di-
D4017 Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials
isobutyrate
by Karl Fischer Method
3.1.23 VOC—volatile organic compound used in various air
D6133 Test Method for Acetone, p-Chlorobenzotrifluoride,
quality regulations
Methyl Acetate or t-Butyl Acetate Content of Solvent-
borne and Waterborne Paints, Coatings, Resins, and Raw
4. Summary of Test Method
Materials by Direct Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph
D7358 Test Method for Water Content of Paints by Quanti-
4.1 A known weight of coating is dispersed in methanol or
tative Calcium Hydride Reaction Test Kit
tetrahydrofuran (THF), internally standardized, and analyzed
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
by capillary gas chromatography to give a speciated composi-
ASTM Test Methods
tion of the volatile organic compounds (Note 3). Summation of
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
theindividualvolatileorganiccompoundweightpercentsgives
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
the total volatile organic content of the coating measured in
weight percent.
2.2 Other Documents:
EPAMethod24 —DeterminationofVolatileMatterContent,
NOTE 3—Methanol can be used as a first choice as a solvent for all
waterborne coatings. THF can be used for solventborne coatings.Acetone
WaterContent,Density,VolumeSolids,andWeightSolids
may also be used for solventborne coatings but should not be used for
of Surface Coatings
waterbornecoatingsbecauseitmayreactwithammoniaandamineswhich
40 CFR 51.100 (s) List of components that EPA has classi-
are frequently found in waterborne coatings. Other solvents can be used if
fied as VOC-exempt
needed but the choice of solvent should be reported.
SCAQMD M313 Determination of Volatile Organic Com-
4.2 DirectGC/FID,GC/MSandsolidphasemicroextraction
pounds (VOC) by Gas Chromatography/Mass
(SPME) / gas chromatography of the coating may be used to
Spectrometry/Flame Ionization Detection (GC/MS/FID)
facilitate identification of the volatile compounds present in a
coating (Note 4). Table X1.1 lists the GC retention times for
3. Terminology
some of the volatile compounds which may be found in low
3.1 Acronyms:
volatile organic compound content air-dry coatings and for
3.1.1 DB—2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol; Butyl Carbitol; di-
several possible internal standards, ordinarily not present in
ethylene glycol monobutyl ether
coatings, which may be used (Note 4).
3.1.2 DP—diethylene glycol monopropyl ether
NOTE 4—The analyst should consult SDS and product data sheets for
information regarding solvents which are expected in a particular coating.
3.1.3 DPM—dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether
Additional solvents, not shown on the SDS or PDS may also be present in
3.1.4 DPnB—dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether the coating. Retention times given in Appendix X1 must be verified for
each individual instrument.
3.1.5 DPnP—dipropylene glycol monopropyl ether
NOTE 5—The accuracy of the volatile organic compound weight
3.1.6 EB—2-butoxyethanol; Butyl Cellosolve; ethylene
percent determined using Test Method D6886 is dependent on the proper
glycol monobutyl ether identification of the compounds detected in the chromatogram. The
response of the FID used in the GC is dependent on the compound
3.1.7 EG—ethylene glycol
detected. The accuracy of the determination requires proper identification
(by GC/MS, by retention time, or by analyzing the sample on a GC
3.1.8 EGDE—ethylene glycol diethyl ether
column with a different stationary phase) and calibration of the GC for the
3.1.9 EP—2-propoxyethanol
compounds detected.
3.1.10 FID—flame ionization detector
4.3 The methods for analysis are:
3.1.11 GC—gas chromatograph
4.3.1 Method A—Analysis is performed using GC/FID by
3.1.12 MS—mass spectrometer
preparing and analyzing standards to determine response
factors and using these response factors for determination of
3.1.13 PG—propylene glycol
the weight concentrations of analytes.
3.1.14 PnB—propylene glycol monobutyl ether
4.3.2 Method B—Analysis is performed using GC/
3.1.15 PnP—propylene glycol monopropyl ether
microreactor/FID (which converts all carbon-containing mol-
3.1.16 RRF—relative response factor
ecules into methane prior to detection in an FID) by first
3.1.17 MRRF—microreactor relative response factor validating the system and subsequently quantifying using
tabulated response factors.
3.1.18 SPME—solid phase microextraction
4.3.3 Method C—Analysis is performed using GC/MS.This
methodismostoftenusedinconjunctionwitheitherMethodA
or Method B, for identification of analytes. Precision statistics
Butyl Carbitol is a registered trademark of The Dow Chemical Company.
Butyl Cellosolve is a registered trademark of The Dow Chemical Company. have not been determined for using GC/MS for quantification.
D6886 − 18
of a reaction with the extraction solvent, then results for that compound
5. Significance and Use
should be discounted from the volatile measured by Test Method D6886.
5.1 In using Practice D3960 to measure the volatile organic
compound content of waterborne coatings, precision can be 6. Apparatus
poor for low volatile organic compound content air-dry coat-
6.1 Gas Chromatograph, with Electronic Data Acquisition
ings if the volatile organic weight percent is determined
System FID Detection, FID/Microreactor Detection. or Mass
indirectly. The present method directly identifies and then
Spectrometry Detection—Any capillary gas chromatograph
quantifies the weight percent of individual volatile organic
equipped with a flame ionization detector microreactor flame
compounds in air-dry coatings (Note 6). The total volatile
ionization detector, or mass spectrometer and temperature
organic weight percent can be obtained by adding the indi-
programming capability may be used. Electronic flow control,
vidual weight percent values (Note 7).
which gives a constant carrier gas flow, is highly recom-
NOTE 6—The present method may be used to speciate solvent-borne
mended. Note that a full precision study has only been
air-dry coatings. However, since these normally contain high, and often
completed for GC with FID detection (Tables X1.2-X1.4). A
complex, quantities of solvent, precision tends to be better using other
preliminary precision study has been completed for GC/
methods contained in Practice D3960, where the volatile fraction is
determined by a direct weight loss determination.
Microreactor/FID (Table X1.5).
NOTE 7—Detectable compounds may result from thermal decomposi-
6.2 Standard GC/FID, GC/Microreactor/FID, and GC/MS
tion in a hot injection port or from reaction with the extraction solvent. If
it can be shown that a material is a decomposition product, or is the result Instrument Conditions:
A
GC/FID GC/Microreactor /FID GC/MS
Instrument Conditions
Method A Method B Method C
B
Detector Flame ionization Microreactor/flame ionization 70 eV electron impact mass spectrometer
Microreactor Air Supply Flow Rate 2.5 mL per min
Microreactor Hydrogen Supply Flow 35 mL per min
Rate
Microreactor Temperature, °C, 450°
Source Temperature, °C, 230°
Quadrupole Temperature °C, 150°
Transfer Line Temperature°C, 260°
Scanning Parameters Mass 29 to 400 amu
FID Air Flow Rate 350 mL per min 350 per min
FID H Air Rate 35 mL per min 1.5 per mL
C
Columns Primary column: 30 m by 0.25 mm 5 % phenyl/95 % methyl siloxane (PMPS) ,C 1.0 µm film thickness
Confirmatory columns: 30 m by 0.25 mm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), 0.25 µm film thickness;
30 m by 0.25 mm Carbowax (CW), 0.25 µm film thickness
Carrier Gas Helium
Flow Rate 1.0 mL per min, constant flow (24.9 cm/s at 40°)
D
Split Ratio 50 to 1
Temperatures, °C,
Primary Column
Inlet 260°
Detector 270°
Initial 50° for 4 min
Rate 20° per min to 250°, hold 6 min (total run time = 20 min)
Temperatures, °C,
Confirmatory Columns
Inlet 260°
Detector 270°
Initial 40° for 4 min
Rate 10° per min to 250°, hold 25 min (total run time = 50 min)
A
The microreactor (for example, Polyarc, a registered trademark of Activated Research Company) is a two-step oxidation-reduction reactor that converts organic
compounds to methane prior to detection in an FID.
B
Any mass spectrometer may be used. The conditions specified are for a quadrupole mass spectrometer and are listed as a reference only.
C
The column designated as PMPS is commercially available from several vendors by the following designations: DB-5, SPB-5, HP-5, AT-5, CP Sil 8 CB, RTx-5, BP-5.
The column designated as PDMS is available by the designations DB-1, SPB-1, HP-1,AT-1, CP Sil 5 CB, Rtx-1. The column designated as Carbowax is available by the
designations Supelcowax 10, DB-Wax, HP-Wax,AT-Wax, CP-Wax 52 CB, Rtx-Wax, BP-20. Inert versions (or other equivalent designations) of the columns listed above
are recommended because they may provide better peak shapes.
D
JenningsCupinletlinerswithnoglasswoolaretherecommendedinletlinertypebecausetheyprovidegoodre
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation: D6886 − 14 D6886 − 18
Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Weight Percent Individual Volatile
Organic Compounds in Waterborne Air-Dry Coatings by Gas
Chromatography
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6886; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
ε NOTE—Research report was added editorially in August 2014.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method is for the determination of the weight percent of individual volatile organic compounds in waterborne
air-dry coatings (Note 1).
1.2 This method may be used for the analysis of coatings containing silanes, siloxanes, and silane-siloxane blends.
1.3 This method is not suitable for the analysis of coatings that cure by chemical reaction (this includes two-component coatings
and coatings which cure when heated) because the dilution herein required will impede the chemical reaction required for these
types of coatings.
1.4 This method can be used to determine the weight percent organic content of Precision statistics for this method have been
determined for waterborne coatings in which the volatile organic compound weight percent is below 5 percent. The method has
been used successfully with higher organic content waterborne coatings and with solventborne coatings (Note 2).
1.5 This method may also be used to measure the exempt volatile organic compound content (for example, acetone, methyl
acetate, t-butyl acetate and p-chlorobezotrifluoride)-chlorobenzotrifluoride) of waterborne and solvent-borne coatings. Check local
regulations for a list of exempt compounds. The methodology is virtually identical to that used in Test Method D6133 which, as
written, is specific for only exempt volatile compounds.
1.6 Volatile compounds that are present at the 0.005 weight percent level (50 ppm) or greater can be determined. A procedure
for doing so is given in Section 9.
1.7 Volatile organic compound content of a coating can be calculated using data from Test Method D6886 but requires other
data (see Appendix X2.)
NOTE 1—Data from this method will not always provide the volatile organic compound content of a paint film equivalent ofto EPA Method 24. Some
compounds and some semi-volatile compounds may be considered volatile using the GC conditions specified but will not fully volatilize during the one
hour at 110°C conditions of EPA Method 24. Some or all of these materials remain in the paint film and therefore are not considered volatile organic
compounds according to EPA Method 24. In addition, some compounds may decompose at the high inlet temperature of the GC. However, note the EPA
Method 24 has poor precision and accuracy at low levels of volatile organic compounds.
NOTE 2—This method measures volatile organic compound weight of air-dry coatings directly as opposed to other methods in Practice D3960 which
measure the volatile organic compound weight percent indirectly. A direct measurement of the weight percent particularly in low volatile organic
compound content waterborne coatings, generally gives better precision. California Polytechnic State University carried out an extensive study for the
California Air Resources Board comparing the precision of the direct method with the indirect method (CARB Standard Agreement No. 04.329) Detailed
results of this study may be found at http://www.arb.ca.gov/coatings/arch/Final_Report_6_11_09.pdf. This study may be used to decide if the present
method or other methods in Practice D3960 are preferred for a specific coating.
1.8 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.9 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.10 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.21 on Chemical Analysis of Paints and Paint Materials.
Current edition approved June 15, 2014Oct. 1, 2018. Published July 2014October 2018. Originally approved in 2003. Last previous edition approved in 20122014 as D6886
ɛ1
– 12.14 . DOI: 10.1520/D6886-14E01.10.1520/D6886-18.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D6886 − 18
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1475 Test Method for Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and Related Products
D2369 Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings
D3792 Test Method for Water Content of Coatings by Direct Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph
D3925 Practice for Sampling Liquid Paints and Related Pigmented Coatings
D3960 Practice for Determining Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content of Paints and Related Coatings
D4017 Test Method for Water in Paints and Paint Materials by Karl Fischer Method
D6133 Test Method for Acetone, p-Chlorobenzotrifluoride, Methyl Acetate or t-Butyl Acetate Content of Solventborne and
Waterborne Paints, Coatings, Resins, and Raw Materials by Direct Injection Into a Gas Chromatograph
D7358 Test Method for Water Content of Paints by Quantitative Calcium Hydride Reaction Test Kit
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
2.2 Other Documents:
EPA Method 24 —Determination of Volatile Matter Content, Water Content, Density, Volume Solids, and Weight Solids of
Surface Coatings
40 CFR 51.100 (s) List of components that EPA has classified as VOC-exempt
SCAQMD M313 Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Flame
Ionization Detection (GC/MS/FID)
3. Terminology
3.1 Acronyms:
3.1.1 EGDE—ethylene glycol diethyl ether
3.1.1 DB—2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol; Butyl Carbitol; diethylene glycol monobutyl ether
3.1.2 DP—diethylene glycol monopropyl ether
3.1.3 DPM—dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether
3.1.4 DPnB—dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether
3.1.5 DPnP—dipropylene glycol monopropyl ether
3.1.6 EB—2-butoxyethanol; Butyl Cellosolve; ethylene glycol monobutyl ether
3.1.7 EG—ethylene glycol
3.1.8 EGDE—ethylene glycol diethyl ether
3.1.9 EP—2-propoxyethanol
3.1.10 FID—flame ionization detector
3.1.11 GC—gas chromatograph
3.1.12 MS—mass spectrometer
3.1.13 PG—propylene glycol
3.1.14 PnB—propylene glycol monobutyl ether
3.1.15 PnP—propylene glycol monopropyl ether
3.1.16 RRF—relative response factor
3.1.17 MRRF—microreactor relative response factor
3.1.18 SPME—solid phase microextraction
3.1.19 SPDE—solid phase dynamic extraction
3.1.20 THF—tetrahydrofuran
3.1.21 TMPD-IB—2,2,4-trimethypentane-1,3-diol, monoisobutyrate
3.1.22 TMPD-DIB—2,2,4-trimethypentane-1,3-diol, diisobutyrate
3.1.23 VOC—volatile organic compound used in various air quality regulations
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Butyl Carbitol is a registered trademark of The Dow Chemical Company.
Butyl Cellosolve is a registered trademark of The Dow Chemical Company.
D6886 − 18
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 A known weight of coating is dispersed in methanol or tetrahydrofuran (THF)(THF), internally standardized, and analyzed
by capillary gas chromatography to give a speciated composition of the volatile organic compounds (Note 3). Summation of the
individual volatile organic compound weight percents gives the total volatile organic content of the coating measured in weight
percent.
NOTE 3—Methanol can be used as a first choice as a solvent for all waterborne coatings. THF can be used for solventborne coatings. Acetone may
also be used for solventborne coatings but should not be used for waterborne coatings because it may react with ammonia and amines which are frequently
found in waterborne coatings. Other solvents can be used if needed but the choice of solvent should be reported.
4.2 Direct GC/FID, GC/MS and solid phase microextraction (SPME) / gas chromatography (SPME/GC) of the coating may be
used to facilitate identification of the volatile compounds present in a coating (Note 4). Table X1.1Table X1.1 lists the GC retention
times for some of the volatile compounds which may be found in low volatile organic compound content air-dry coatings and for
several possible internal standards, ordinarily not present in coatings, which may be used (Note 4).
NOTE 4—The analyst should consult MSDSSDS and product data sheets for information regarding solvents which are expected in a particular coating.
Additional solvents, not shown on the MSDSSDS or PDS may also be present in the coating. Retention times given in Appendix X1 must be verified
for each individual instrument.
NOTE 5—The accuracy of the volatile organic compound weight percent determined using Test Method D6886 is dependent on the proper identification
of the compounds detected in the chromatogram. The response of the flame ionization detector (FID) FID used in the GC is dependent on the compound
detected. The accuracy of the determination requires proper identification (by GC/MS, by retention time, or by analyzing the sample on a GC column
with a different stationary phase) and calibration of the GC for the compounds detected.
4.3 The methods for analysis are:
4.3.1 Method A—Analysis is performed using GC/FID by preparing and analyzing standards to determine response factors and
using these response factors for determination of the weight concentrations of analytes.
4.3.2 Method B—Analysis is performed using GC/microreactor/FID (which converts all carbon-containing molecules into
methane prior to detection in an FID) by first validating the system and subsequently quantifying using tabulated response factors.
4.3.3 Method C—Analysis is performed using GC/MS. This method is most often used in conjunction with either Method A or
Method B, for identification of analytes. Precision statistics have not been determined for using GC/MS for quantification.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 In using Practice D3960 to measure the volatile organic compound content of waterborne coatings, precision can be poor
for low volatile organic compound content air-dry coatings if the volatile organic weight percent is determined indirectly. The
present method directly identifies and then quantifies the weight percent of individual volatile organic compounds in air-dry
coatings (Note 6). The total volatile organic weight percent can be obtained by adding the individual weight percent values (Note
7).
NOTE 6—The present method may be used to speciate solvent-borne air-dry coatings. However, since these normally contain high, and often complex,
quantities of solvent, precision tends to be better using other methods contained in Practice D3960, where the volatile fraction is determined by a direct
weight loss determination.
NOTE 7—Detectable compounds may result from thermal decomposition in a hot injection port or from reaction with the extraction solvent. If it can
be shown that a material is a decomposition product, or is the result of a reaction with the extraction solvent, then results for that compound should be
discounted from the volatile measured by Test Method D6886.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Gas Chromatograph, FID Detection or Mass Spectrometry Detection with Electronic Data Acquisition System—with
Electronic Data Acquisition System FID Detection, FID/Microreactor Detection. or Mass Spectrometry Detection—Any capillary
gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector microreactor flame ionization detector, or mass spectrometer and
temperature programming capability may be used. Electronic flow control, which gives a constant carrier gas flow, is highly
recommended. Note that precision and accuracy have only been evaluated usinga full precision study has only been completed for
GC with FID detection.detection (Tables X1.2-X1.4). A preliminary precision study has been completed for GC/Microreactor/FID
(Table X1.5).
D6886 − 18
6.2 Standard GC/FID GC/FID, GC/Microreactor/FID, and GC/MS Instrument Conditions:
A
GC/FID GC/Microreactor /FID GC/MS
Instrument Conditions
Method A Method B Method C
Instrument Conditions FID GC/MS
Detector Flame ionization Microreactor/flame ionization 70 eV electron impact mass
B
spectrometer
Microreactor Air Supply Flow Rate 2.5 mL per min
Microreactor Hydrogen Supply Flow 35 mL per min
Rate
Microreactor Temperature, °C, 450°
Source Temperature, °C, 230°
Quadrupole Temperature °C, 150°
Transfer Line Temperature°C, 260°
Scanning Parameters Mass 29 to 400 amu
FID Air Flow Rate 350 mL per min 350 per min
FID H Air Rate 35 mL per min 1.5 per mL
Columns Primary column: Primary
30 by 0.25 mm 30 by
5 % phenyl/95 % methyl % phenyl/95
A
siloxane (PMPS), siloxane
1.0 μm film thickness 1.0 μm
Columns Primary column:
30 m by 0.25 mm
5 % phenyl/95 % methyl
C
siloxane (PMPS)
,C 1.0 μm film thickness
Confirmatory Columns: Confirmatory
30 by 0.25 mm 30 by
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polydimethylsiloxane
0.25 μm film thickness; 0.25 μm
30 by 0.25 mm 30 by
Carbowax (CW), Carbowax
0.25 μm film thickness. 0.25 μm
Confirmatory columns:
30 m by 0.25 mm
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS),
0.25 μm film thickness;
30 m by 0.25 mm Carbowax (CW), 0.25 μm film thickness
Carrier Gas Helium
Carrier Gas Helium
Flow Rate 1.0 mL per min, 1.0 mL
constant flow constant
(24.9 cm/s at 40°) (24.9
Flow Rate 1.0 mL per min,
constant flow
(24.9 cm/s at 40°)
Split Ratio 50 to 1
D
Split Ratio 50 to 1
Temperatures, °C,
Primary Column
Inlet 260°
In
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.