ASTM D3043-17

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D3043 − 00 (Reapproved 2011) D3043 − 17
Standard Test Methods for
Structural Panels in Flexure
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3043; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 These test methods determine the flexural properties of strips cut from structural panels or panels up to 4 by 8 ft in size.
Structural panels in use include plywood, waferboard, oriented strand board, and composites of veneer and of wood-based layers.
Four methods of tests are included:
Sections
Method A—Center-Point Flexure Test 5
Method B—Two-Point Flexure Test 6
Method C—Large Panel Test 7
Method D—Flexure Test for Quality Assurance 8
The choice of method will be dictated by the purpose of the test, type of material, and equipment availability. All methods are
applicable to material that is relatively uniform in strength and stiffness properties. Only Method C should be used to test material
suspected of having strength or stiffness variations within a panel caused by density variations, knots, knot-holes, areas of distorted
grain, fungal attack, or wide growth variations. However, Method B may be used to evaluate certain features such as core gaps
and veneer joints in plywood panels where effects are readily projected to full panels. Method C generally is preferred where size
of test material permits. Moments applied to fail specimens tested by Method A, B or D in which large deflections occur can be
considerably larger than nominal. An approximate correction can be made.
Sections
Method A—Center-Point Flexure Test 5
Method B—Two-Point Flexure Test 6
Method C—Pure Moment Test 7
Method D—Flexure Test for Quality Assurance 8
The choice of method will be dictated by the purpose of the test, type of material, and equipment availability. All methods are
applicable to material that is relative uniform in strength and stiffness properties. Only Method C should be used to test mate-
rial suspected of having strength or stiffness variations within a panel caused by density variations, knots, knot-holes, areas of
distorted grain, fungal attack, or wide growth variations. However, Method B may be used to evaluate certain features such as
core gaps and veneer joints in plywood panels where effects are readily projected to full panels. Method C generally is pre-
ferred where size of test material permits. Moments applied to fail specimens tested by Method A, B or D in which large de-
flections occur can be considerably larger than nominal. An approximate correction can be made.
1.2 Method A, Center-Point Flexure Test—This method is applicable to material that is uniform with respect to elastic and
strength properties. Total deflection, and modulus of elasticity computed from it, include a relatively constant component
attributable to shear deformation. It is well suited to investigations of many variables that influence properties uniformly
throughout the panel in controlled studies and to test small, defect-free control specimens cut from large panels containing defects
tested by the large-specimen method.
1.3 Method B, Two-Point Flexure Test—This method, like Method A, is suited to the investigation of factors that influence
strength and elastic properties uniformly throughout the panel, in controlled studies, and to testing small, defect free control
specimens cut from large specimens tested by Method C. However, it may be used to determine the effects of finger joints, veneer
joints and gaps, and other features which can be placed entirely between the load points and whose effects can be projected readily
to full panel width. Deflection and modulus of elasticity obtained from this method are related to flexural stress only and do not
contain a shear component. Significant errors in modulus of rupture can occur when nominal moment is used (see Appendix X1).
These methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D07 on Wood and are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D07.03 on Panel Products.
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2011Nov. 15, 2017. Published November 2011December 2017. Originally approved in 1972. Last previous edition approved in 20002011
as D3043 – 00 (2006).(2011). DOI: 10.1520/D3043-00R11.10.1520/D3043-17.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D3043 − 17
1.4 Method C, Pure MomentLarge Panel Test—This method is ideally suited for evaluating effects of knots, knot-holes, areas
of sloping grain, and patches for their effect on standard full-size panels. It is equally well suited for testing uniform or clear
material whenever specimen size is adequate. Measured deformation and elastic constants are free of shear deformation effects;
and panels can be bent to large deflections without incurring errors from horizontal force components occurring in other methods.
Specimen size and span above certain minimums are quite flexible. It is preferred when equipment is available.
1.5 Method D, Flexure Test for Quality Assurance—This method, like Method A, is well suited to the investigation of factors
that influence bending strength and stiffness properties. Also like Method A, this method uses small specimens in a center-point
simple span test configuration. This method uses a span to depth ratio, specimen width, test fixture and test speed that make the
method well suited for quality assurance. The method is frequently used for quality assurance testing of oriented strand board.
1.6 All methods can be used to determine modulus of elasticity with sufficient accuracy. Modulus of rupture determined by
Methods A, B or D is subject to errors up to and sometimes exceeding 20 % depending upon span, loading, and deflection at failure
unless moment is computed in the rigorous manner outlined in Appendix X1 or corrections are made in other ways. These errors
are not present in Method C.
1.7 When comparisons are desired between results of specimen groups, it is good practice to use the same method of test for
all specimens, thus eliminating possible differences relatable to test method.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D2395 Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Wood and Wood-Based Materials
D4442 Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Based Materials
D4761 Test Methods for Mechanical Properties of Lumber and Wood-Base Structural Material
3. Significance and Use
3.1 These methods give the flexural properties, principally strength and stiffness, of structural panels. These properties are of
primary importance in most structural uses of panels whether in construction for floors, wall sheathing, roof decking, concrete
form, or various space plane structures; packaging and materials handling for containers, crates, or pallets; or structural
components such as stress-skin panels.
3.2 To control or define other variables influencing flexure properties, moisture content and time to failure must be determined.
Conditioning of test material at controlled atmospheres to control test moisture content and determination of specific gravity are
recommended. Comparisons of results of plywood, veneer composites, and laminates with solid wood or other plywood
constructions will be greatly assisted if the thickness of the individual plies is measured to permit computation of section
properties.
4. Control of Moisture Content
4.1 Structural panel samples to be tested at a specific moisture content or relative humidity shall be conditioned to approximate
constant mass in controlled atmospheric conditions before testing. For structural panels used under dry conditions, a relative
humidity of 65 6 5 % at a temperature of 68 6 6°F (20 6 3°C) is recommended.
5. Method A—Center-Point Flexure Test
5.1 Summary—A conventional compression testing machine is used to apply and measure a load at mid-span of a small flexure
specimen; and the resulting deflection at mid span is measured or recorded. The test proceeds at a constant rate of head motion
until either sufficient deflection data in the elastic range have been gathered or until specimen failure occurs. The specimen is
supported on reaction bearings which permit the specimen and bearing plate to roll freely over the reactions as the specimen
deflects.
5.2 Test Specimen—The test specimen shall be rectangular in cross section. The depth of the specimen shall be equal to the
thickness of material, and the width shall be 1 in. (25 mm) for depths less than ⁄4 in. (6 mm) and 2 in. (50 mm) for greater depths
(Note 1). When the principal direction of the face plies, laminations, strands, or wafers is parallel to the span, the length of the
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
D3043 − 17
specimen (Note 2) shall be not less than 48 times the depth plus 2 in.; when the principal direction of the face plies, laminations,
strands, or wafers is perpendicular to the span, the specimen length shall be not less than 24 times the depth plus 2 in. (Note 3).
NOTE 1—In certain specific instances, it may be necessary or desirable to test specimens having a width greater than 1 or 2 in. (25 or 50 mm). To
eliminate plate action when wider specimens are tested, the specimen width shall not exceed one third of the span length and precaution shall be taken
to ensure uniform bearing across the entire width of the specimen at the load and reaction points.
NOTE 2—In cutting specimens to meet the length requirement, it is not intended that the length be changed for small variations in thickness. Rather,
it is intended that the nominal thickness of the material under test should be used for determining the specimen length.
5.2.1 Measurements—Measure specimen thickness at mid-span at two points near each edge and record the average. Measure
to the nearest 0.001 in. (0.02 mm) or 0.3 %. Measure width at mid-span to the nearest 0.3 %.
5.2.1.1 When needed for interpretation of test results for plywood, veneer composites, and laminates measure thickness of each
layer to the nearest 0.001 in. (0.02 mm) at mid-span at each edge and record the average.
5.3 Span—The span shall be at least 48 times the nominal depth when the principal direction of the face plies, laminations,
strands, or wafers of the test specimen is parallel to the span and at least 24 times the nominal depth when the principal direction
of the face plies, laminations, strands, or wafers is perpendicular to the span (Note 3).
NOTE 3—Establishment of a span-depth ratio is required to allow an accurate comparison of test values for materials of different thicknesses. It should
be noted that the span is based on the nominal thickness of the material and it is not intended that the spans be changed for small variations in thickness.
5.4 End Supports—Reaction points shall be capable of freely compensating for warp of the test specimen by turning laterally
in a plane perpendicular to the specimen length so as to apply load uniformly across its width. Design of end supports shall place
the center of rotation near the neutral axis of the specimen of average thickness. Construction is shown in detail in Fig. 1. Bearing
points shall be rounded where they contact the specimen.
5.4.1 Use of bearing plates is generally recommended and is required wherever significant local deformation may occur.
5.4.2 Use of roller bearings or plates and rollers to preclude friction forces between end support and specimen is recommended
in addition to the requirement of lateral compensation. Construction of a suitable end support using small roller bearings in
conjunction with a plate which clips to the end of the specimen is illustrated in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The use of a large ball bearing
to provide lateral compensation for warp is also illustrated. This method is particularly recommended for thin specimens and small
loads.
5.4.3 As the specimen deflects during test, loads no longer act in the direction assumed in formulas for calculating properties.
For a discussion of these errors, their effects, and methods for reducing them, refer to Appendix X1.
5.5 Loading Block—A loading block having a radius of curvature of approximately one and one-half times the depth of the test
specimen for a chord length of not less than twice the depth of the specimen shall be used. In cases where excessive local
deformation may occur, suitable bearing plates shall be used. Radius of curvature of bearing plate or block shall not be so large
as to cause bridging as the specimen bends.
5.6 Loading Procedure—Apply the load with a continuous motion of the movable head throughout the test. The rate of load
application shall be such that the maximum fiber strain rate is equal to 0.0015 in./in. (mm/mm) per min within a permissible
variation of 625 %. Load shall be measured to an accuracy of 61 % of indicated value or 0.4 percent of full scale, whichever is
larger. Calculate the rate of motion of the movable head as follows:
N 5 zL /6d (1)
where:
N = rate of motion of moving head, in./min (mm/min),
L = span, in. (mm),
d = depth of beam, in. (mm), and
z = unit rate of fiber strain, in./in.·min (mm/mm·min) of outer fiber length = 0.0015.
5.6.1 Measure the elapsed time from initiation of loading to maximum load and record to the nearest ⁄2 min.
5.7 Measurement of Deflection—Take data for load-deflection curves to determine the modulus of elasti
...